|
RETURN
TO TRANSCRIPTS INDEX
FBI
COINTELPRO Documents(2)
Congressman Don Edwards (D-California), said of COINTELPRO in 1975 after Congressional inquiry
revealed its activities: "Regardless of the unattractiveness or noisy militancy of some private
citizens or organizations, the Constitution does not permit federal interference with their activities
except through the criminal justice system, armed with its ancient safeguards. There are no exceptions.
No federal agency, the CIA, the IRS, the FBI, can be at the same time policeman, prosecutor, judge
and jury. That is what constitutionally guaranteed due process is all about. It may sometimes be
disorderly and unsatisfactory to some, but it is the essence of freedom. . . . I suggest that the
philosophy supporting COINTELPRO is the subversive notion that any public official, the President
or a policeman, possesses a kind of inherent power to set aside the Constitution whenever he thinks
the public interest, or 'national security' warrants it. That notion is postulate of tyranny."
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT /
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Memorandum
Date: 7/5/68
To: SAC, Albany
From: Director, FBI (100-449608)
Subject: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROGRAM
INTERNAL SECURITY
DISRUPTION FROM THE NEW LEFT
(COINTELPRO - NEW LEFT)
Bulet 5/10/68 requested suggestions for counterintelligence action against the New Left. The replies
to the Bureau's request have been analyzed and it is felt that the following suggestions for counterintelligence
action can be utilized by all offices:
1. Preparation of a leaflet designed to counteract the impression that Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS) and other minority groups speak for the majority of students at universities. The
leaflet should contain photographs of New Left leadership at the respective university. Naturally,
the most obnoxious pictures should be used.
2. The instigating of or the taking advantage of personal conflicts of animosities existing
between New Left leaders.
3. The creating of impressions that certain New Left leaders are informants for the Bureau
or other law enforcement agencies.
4. The use of articles from student newspapers and/or the "underground press" to
show the depravity of new Left leaders and members. In this connection, articles showing advocation
of the use of narcotics and free sex are ideal to send to university officials, wealthy donors,
members of the legislature and parents of students who are active in new Left matters.
5. Since the use of marijuana and other narcotics is widespread among members of the New
Left, you should be alert to opportunities to have them arrested by local authorities on drug charges.
Any information concerning the fact that individuals have marijuana or are engaging in a narcotics
party should be immediately furnished to local authorities and they should be encouraged to take
action.
6. The drawing up of anonymous letters regarding individuals active in the New left. These
letters should set out their activities and should be sent to their parents, neighbors and parents'
employers. This could have the effect of forcing the parents to take action.
7. Anonymous letters or leaflets describing faculty members and graduate assistants in the
various institutions of higher learning who are active in New Left matters. The activities and associations
of the individual should be set out. Anonymous mailings should be made to university officials,
members of the state legislature, Board of Regents, and to the press. Such letters could be signed
"A Concerned Alumni" or "A Concerned Taxpayer."
8. Whenever New Left groups engage in disruptive activities on college campuses, cooperative
press contacts should be encouraged to emphasize that the disruptive elements constitute a minority
of the students and do not represent the conviction of the majority. The press should demand an
immediate student referendum on the issue in question. Inasmuch as the overwhelming majority of
students is not active in New Left matters, it is felt that this technique, used in carefully selected
cases, could put an end to lengthy demonstrations and could cause embarrassment to New Left elements.
9. There is a definite hostility among SDS and other New Left groups toward the Socialist
Workers Party (SWP), the Young Socialist Alliance (YSA), and the Progressive Labor Party (PLP).
This hostility should be exploited wherever possible.
10. The field was previously advised that New Left groups are attempting to open coffeehouses
near military bases in order to influence members of the Armed Forces. Wherever these coffeehouses
are, friendly news media should be alerted to them and their purpose. In addition, various drugs,
such as marijuana, will probably be utilized by individuals running the coffeehouses or frequenting
them. Local law enforcement authorities should be promptly advised whenever you receive an indication
that this is being done.
11. Consider the use of cartoons, photographs, and anonymous letters which will have the
effect of ridiculing the New left. Ridicule is one of the most potent weapons which we can use against
it.
12. Be alert for opportunities to confuse and disrupt New Left activities by misinformation.
For example, when events are planned, notification that the event has been canceled or postponed
could be sent to various individuals.
You are reminded that no counterintelligence action is to be taken without Bureau approval. Insure
that this Program is assigned to an Agent with an excellent knowledge of both New Left groups and
individuals. It must be approached with imagination and enthusiasm if it is to be successful.
As an economy measure the caption "COINTELPRO - NEW LEFT" should be used on all communications
concerning this program.
NOTE:
See memo C.D. Brennan to W.C. Sullivan dated 7/3/68, captioned as above, prepared by BAW:jes.
BAW: jes
1 - Mr. LeLoach
1 - Mr. Felt
1 - Mr. Bishop
1 - Mr. W.C. Sullivan
1 - Mr. C.D. Brennan
1 - [deleted]
1 - [deleted]
2 - All Field Offices
|